Review




Structured Review

CH Instruments double-exponential decay model
Double Exponential Decay Model, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double-exponential decay model/product/CH Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double-exponential decay model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
MathWorks Inc double exponential decay model
(A) Schematic of pocket device for in vitro 3D directed neutrophil migration assays. (B) Sample image of cells migrating in a pocket device with Trackmate cell tracking results overlayed. Inset shows the time sequence for a chemotaxing cell, with tracked trajectory overlayed in green. Scale bar, 1000 µm. (C) Probability density maps of aggregated trajectory endpoints are shown for dHL-60 cells in each of the four conditions with representative sample tracks overlayed. Sample track color saturation increases with time. The dashed red reference circle superimposed on each inset figure represents unbiased random motion. fMLP concentration increases linearly in the positive y direction. Black arrows show the large angle turns. Scale bar, 20 µm. (D) Population average chemotactic index (CI). (E) Population average mean cell speeds in four treatment conditions in the presence of fMLP gradient. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. All pairwise conditions showed statistically significant differences besides those labeled n.s. (not significant) in (D-E). **** P < 0.0001 according to the one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. (F) Mean squared displacements (MSDs) versus distance separation along cell trajectories, r 2 (Δ s ). (G) Tangent vector autocorrelations versus distance traveled, ( Ctt ((Δ s )), for f MLP condition, of four treatment conditions. The inset represents the enlarged portion of the initial decay. (H) Migratory persistence length, L P . Values reflect the characteristic length of the slow decaying component of the double <t>exponential</t> fit, with error bars calculated via bootstrapping (see Methods). **** P < 0.0001 according to the Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test.
Double Exponential Decay Model, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double exponential decay model/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double exponential decay model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriginLab corp single and double exponential decay models
(A) Schematic of pocket device for in vitro 3D directed neutrophil migration assays. (B) Sample image of cells migrating in a pocket device with Trackmate cell tracking results overlayed. Inset shows the time sequence for a chemotaxing cell, with tracked trajectory overlayed in green. Scale bar, 1000 µm. (C) Probability density maps of aggregated trajectory endpoints are shown for dHL-60 cells in each of the four conditions with representative sample tracks overlayed. Sample track color saturation increases with time. The dashed red reference circle superimposed on each inset figure represents unbiased random motion. fMLP concentration increases linearly in the positive y direction. Black arrows show the large angle turns. Scale bar, 20 µm. (D) Population average chemotactic index (CI). (E) Population average mean cell speeds in four treatment conditions in the presence of fMLP gradient. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. All pairwise conditions showed statistically significant differences besides those labeled n.s. (not significant) in (D-E). **** P < 0.0001 according to the one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. (F) Mean squared displacements (MSDs) versus distance separation along cell trajectories, r 2 (Δ s ). (G) Tangent vector autocorrelations versus distance traveled, ( Ctt ((Δ s )), for f MLP condition, of four treatment conditions. The inset represents the enlarged portion of the initial decay. (H) Migratory persistence length, L P . Values reflect the characteristic length of the slow decaying component of the double <t>exponential</t> fit, with error bars calculated via bootstrapping (see Methods). **** P < 0.0001 according to the Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test.
Single And Double Exponential Decay Models, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/single and double exponential decay models/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
single and double exponential decay models - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments double-exponential decay model
(A) Schematic of pocket device for in vitro 3D directed neutrophil migration assays. (B) Sample image of cells migrating in a pocket device with Trackmate cell tracking results overlayed. Inset shows the time sequence for a chemotaxing cell, with tracked trajectory overlayed in green. Scale bar, 1000 µm. (C) Probability density maps of aggregated trajectory endpoints are shown for dHL-60 cells in each of the four conditions with representative sample tracks overlayed. Sample track color saturation increases with time. The dashed red reference circle superimposed on each inset figure represents unbiased random motion. fMLP concentration increases linearly in the positive y direction. Black arrows show the large angle turns. Scale bar, 20 µm. (D) Population average chemotactic index (CI). (E) Population average mean cell speeds in four treatment conditions in the presence of fMLP gradient. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. All pairwise conditions showed statistically significant differences besides those labeled n.s. (not significant) in (D-E). **** P < 0.0001 according to the one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. (F) Mean squared displacements (MSDs) versus distance separation along cell trajectories, r 2 (Δ s ). (G) Tangent vector autocorrelations versus distance traveled, ( Ctt ((Δ s )), for f MLP condition, of four treatment conditions. The inset represents the enlarged portion of the initial decay. (H) Migratory persistence length, L P . Values reflect the characteristic length of the slow decaying component of the double <t>exponential</t> fit, with error bars calculated via bootstrapping (see Methods). **** P < 0.0001 according to the Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test.
Double Exponential Decay Model, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/double-exponential decay model/product/CH Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
double-exponential decay model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SYSTAT four parameter double exponential decay models
(A) Schematic of pocket device for in vitro 3D directed neutrophil migration assays. (B) Sample image of cells migrating in a pocket device with Trackmate cell tracking results overlayed. Inset shows the time sequence for a chemotaxing cell, with tracked trajectory overlayed in green. Scale bar, 1000 µm. (C) Probability density maps of aggregated trajectory endpoints are shown for dHL-60 cells in each of the four conditions with representative sample tracks overlayed. Sample track color saturation increases with time. The dashed red reference circle superimposed on each inset figure represents unbiased random motion. fMLP concentration increases linearly in the positive y direction. Black arrows show the large angle turns. Scale bar, 20 µm. (D) Population average chemotactic index (CI). (E) Population average mean cell speeds in four treatment conditions in the presence of fMLP gradient. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. All pairwise conditions showed statistically significant differences besides those labeled n.s. (not significant) in (D-E). **** P < 0.0001 according to the one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. (F) Mean squared displacements (MSDs) versus distance separation along cell trajectories, r 2 (Δ s ). (G) Tangent vector autocorrelations versus distance traveled, ( Ctt ((Δ s )), for f MLP condition, of four treatment conditions. The inset represents the enlarged portion of the initial decay. (H) Migratory persistence length, L P . Values reflect the characteristic length of the slow decaying component of the double <t>exponential</t> fit, with error bars calculated via bootstrapping (see Methods). **** P < 0.0001 according to the Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test.
Four Parameter Double Exponential Decay Models, supplied by SYSTAT, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/four parameter double exponential decay models/product/SYSTAT
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
four parameter double exponential decay models - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Schematic of pocket device for in vitro 3D directed neutrophil migration assays. (B) Sample image of cells migrating in a pocket device with Trackmate cell tracking results overlayed. Inset shows the time sequence for a chemotaxing cell, with tracked trajectory overlayed in green. Scale bar, 1000 µm. (C) Probability density maps of aggregated trajectory endpoints are shown for dHL-60 cells in each of the four conditions with representative sample tracks overlayed. Sample track color saturation increases with time. The dashed red reference circle superimposed on each inset figure represents unbiased random motion. fMLP concentration increases linearly in the positive y direction. Black arrows show the large angle turns. Scale bar, 20 µm. (D) Population average chemotactic index (CI). (E) Population average mean cell speeds in four treatment conditions in the presence of fMLP gradient. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. All pairwise conditions showed statistically significant differences besides those labeled n.s. (not significant) in (D-E). **** P < 0.0001 according to the one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. (F) Mean squared displacements (MSDs) versus distance separation along cell trajectories, r 2 (Δ s ). (G) Tangent vector autocorrelations versus distance traveled, ( Ctt ((Δ s )), for f MLP condition, of four treatment conditions. The inset represents the enlarged portion of the initial decay. (H) Migratory persistence length, L P . Values reflect the characteristic length of the slow decaying component of the double exponential fit, with error bars calculated via bootstrapping (see Methods). **** P < 0.0001 according to the Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Neutrophils exhibit distinct migration phenotypes that are modulated by transendothelial migration

doi: 10.1101/2024.10.17.618860

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of pocket device for in vitro 3D directed neutrophil migration assays. (B) Sample image of cells migrating in a pocket device with Trackmate cell tracking results overlayed. Inset shows the time sequence for a chemotaxing cell, with tracked trajectory overlayed in green. Scale bar, 1000 µm. (C) Probability density maps of aggregated trajectory endpoints are shown for dHL-60 cells in each of the four conditions with representative sample tracks overlayed. Sample track color saturation increases with time. The dashed red reference circle superimposed on each inset figure represents unbiased random motion. fMLP concentration increases linearly in the positive y direction. Black arrows show the large angle turns. Scale bar, 20 µm. (D) Population average chemotactic index (CI). (E) Population average mean cell speeds in four treatment conditions in the presence of fMLP gradient. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. All pairwise conditions showed statistically significant differences besides those labeled n.s. (not significant) in (D-E). **** P < 0.0001 according to the one-way ANOVA Tukey’s test. (F) Mean squared displacements (MSDs) versus distance separation along cell trajectories, r 2 (Δ s ). (G) Tangent vector autocorrelations versus distance traveled, ( Ctt ((Δ s )), for f MLP condition, of four treatment conditions. The inset represents the enlarged portion of the initial decay. (H) Migratory persistence length, L P . Values reflect the characteristic length of the slow decaying component of the double exponential fit, with error bars calculated via bootstrapping (see Methods). **** P < 0.0001 according to the Brown-Forsythe ANOVA test.

Article Snippet: Based on the presence of two distinct decay regimes evident in semi-log plots of C tt , the migratory persistence length for each condition was estimated by fitting C tt to a double exponential decay model, expressed as for each treatment condition (lsqcurvefit, MATLAB).

Techniques: In Vitro, Migration, Cell Tracking Assay, Sequencing, Concentration Assay, Labeling, Plasmid Preparation